You are not logged in.
I am confused by all the hype surrounding the G-Spot and its relationship to female ejaculation. I have been under the impression that women who have never ejaculated in the past could 'learn' how to do so by stimulating the G-Spot during masturbation or partnered sex. I would love to hear from any of the contributors on this site whether they have experienced first-time ejaculation and whether the experience is better than, worse than, or equivalent to prior orgasms.
Offline
I am equally confused by this hype, but what I am pretty sure about is that G-spot and clitoris is same thing inside me, just "clit" is like a little external bit and G-spot is all the rest of it. Past that I have no clue about anything.
Offline
I'm no sure if you'll be able to watch this outside of Canada but CBC did a documentary called 'In Search of the G-Spot'. It is kinda scientific, but it touches a bit on the hype and controversy surrounding the "mysterious" G-Spot.
I dunno. After watching the documentary I played around a bit. Ended up ejaculating really freaking forcefully, but I was thinking way toohard about the science at hand to have space in my brain to feel anything even remotely like a mind blowing orgasm... I tend to over think things though. Other (normal) people may not have this issue.
Spoiler alert: The documentary involves some really unfriendly looking probes. Might make you think twice about offering to jerk off for "research" purposes.
Last edited by jane_e (31-01-12 02:47:51)
Offline
Jane
That is a fascinating video and I am learning lots ... as usual.
Thanks for the link
It is a lot longer than I expected, it appered to be 1.5 hours but is actually only 45 mins ... very interesting
Last edited by ashmedi2 (31-01-12 04:25:08)
Ashmedi is an ancient god of rage and lust ...
I never feel rage, but lust is my fav of the 7 deadly sins ...
Offline
I think that channel hates australia
PLEASE I WANT TO KNOW YOUR SCIENCE SECRETS.
Offline
I think that channel hates australia
PLEASE I WANT TO KNOW YOUR SCIENCE SECRETS.
I assume you can't see it??? If true, try this link to the Episodes index, if you can get there, it is on Page 3 ...
http://www.cbc.ca/doczone/episodes.html
and this is a different link to a 4 min promo, but if you can't get to one, this probably won't work either
http://www.cbc.ca/doczone/episode/in-se … spot.html#
Last edited by ashmedi2 (31-01-12 04:39:22)
Ashmedi is an ancient god of rage and lust ...
I never feel rage, but lust is my fav of the 7 deadly sins ...
Offline
Where it says "Watch the promo or the full episode." below the video and I've found if I click on promo there, I can see the 4 min promo.
I think it illustrates the pressure women are under to come purely vaginaly when research has reported around 70% of women don't. And the word is don't, not can't. So the guy being paid to surgically enhance the G spot is gonna say every woman has one and that's not true and the truth shouldn't be a barrier to sexual satisfaction at all. I agree with Betty Dodson the clitorus is a womans main sex organ. Men have a penis and women have a clitoris+. As the clit has 3 parts it's surface area and nerve connections are greater than the penis. So indirect stimulation is more successful.
I find it fascinating that a clit can be awakened to become fully orgasmic even after the owner was unaware of it's existence at all until well into adult life!!! That's an extreme case from the 70s but a terible enditement of societies patriarchal view of sex. If someone has clitoral nerve endings that extend into their vagina that's a plus. It's part of clitoris+.
.
Last edited by blissed (31-01-12 12:12:04)
(Self made tycoon and independant financial advisor to the stars)
Offline
Damn internets and their stupid regin locking of content.
I tried googling for it, to see if there were any torrents or some such shady ways of getting at the documentary, but googling the g-spot gives a few too many results...
I did however stumble upon this other project asking for funding for a similarly themed documentary, with a short preview as well.
http://www.indiegogo.com/SearchingForG
Edit: Which apparently was fairly old by now. Boy is my face red...
Last edited by Nowaysis (31-01-12 14:30:59)
Let us scatter our clothes to the wind
Offline
Yeah none of those work for us down under, even the promo. Sigh.
Wait, Blissed, are you saying that some vaginas don't have g-spots? I'm not an expert by any means, but I think that "normal" - that is, non-inclusive only of extreme cases of medical anomaly - vaginas, if they have clitori, have g-spots. Because I don't think there's a different between clit and vag orgasms, except like, the difference between an orgasm I get when I'm being fucked from behind and the orgasm I get when I'm going down on someone, different variations on the same theme.
I can't imagine a vagina with a clit but not a gspot because to me those are the same thing, felt from different angles. from what I can tell on my own vagina ... it's like, my pleasure center is a ball, and part of it sticks out, and the rest is inside, and my vagina is one thing, not like, lots of different things...
ok I feel dumb! maybe I am wrong!
Offline
The research indicates that the G-Spot is not a specific thing, but rather an identifiable location at the conjunction of the 2 internal arms wrapping the vagina. Because eevery girl is different and unique, every G-spot will be in a different location, and measurements with MRI's indicate the location will be large in some girls and small in others, same as girls can have large or small visible clits. It further went on to say that girls/women with larger G-spots are the most often to be the ejaculators ... as at current data it would indicate that all girls ejaculate, but girls with small g-spots will ejaculate so little as to not be noticed, larger g-spots provide gushers. The whole vid was 45 mins and had lots of various stats and theories, but work is still being done ...
I don't know if this helps anybody or not ...
Ashmedi is an ancient god of rage and lust ...
I never feel rage, but lust is my fav of the 7 deadly sins ...
Offline
It further went on to say that girls/women with larger G-spots are the most often to be the ejaculators ... as at current data it would indicate that all girls ejaculate, but girls with small g-spots will ejaculate so little as to not be noticed, larger g-spots provide gushers.
That's pretty interesting. Especially if the g-spot is as you say simply where the extension of the clitoris meets the vaginal canal. It seems to me that there needs be something more to it if it has such a great effect on something as tangible as squirting. But I'm no scientist, and I haven't seen the film. I really want to see it.
Maybe this is a bad analogy, but I can't help but think that there is, to my knowledge, no relation between the seize of a man's balls, or for that matter penis, and the volume of sperm he ejaculates.
Last edited by Nowaysis (01-02-12 01:32:32)
Let us scatter our clothes to the wind
Offline
Other info indicates the female has a number of glands that cause the ejaculate and the liquid contains PSA which is the item used to check the male Prostate for indications of problems. Apparently the scientists were surprised to find PSA in the female body altho they now surmise these glands are the female equivalent of the male prostrate gland..
Nowaysis - Various studies have indicated the male prostrate can have an effect on male ejaculation and as an older fart with an enlarged prostrate, I know my ejaculate has changed for both amount and consistency ...
Last edited by ashmedi2 (01-02-12 03:13:35)
Ashmedi is an ancient god of rage and lust ...
I never feel rage, but lust is my fav of the 7 deadly sins ...
Offline
Like I said, it was probably a bad analogy. I kind of had a hunch the prostate was a better equivalent.
Let us scatter our clothes to the wind
Offline
Be nice to know the neural architecture of the clits relation to the vagina but as the promo said we don't know very much and very few people are invested in finding out. Which is a shame. Perhaps advances in general neural science could open up our understanding there.
Viva I just meant the definition of the G spot as being orgasmic. The 2 surveys I've read about suggest only 30% of women can come from vaginal penetration alone, and the clitoral vagina configuration of the others doesn't provide enough stimulation there to orgasm from vaginal penetration alone, not that those women have no vaginal sexual pleasure. Even if the research is wrong and only a few women can't come vaginally, I just think a social expectation that they should is unfair.
There is science involved in sex like anything, but sex to me is an art and personal humanity and art is full of anomalies as people are, and like any other area of our lives libido and sexuality changes so the goal for me isn't to have a complete scientific understanding of sex, but like art or meeting people I just enjoy my own perspective and the process of discovery. Something that before the internet I couldn't really do as expectations of normality where the predominant influence rather than appreciating and taking pleasure in discovering our diversity.
.
Last edited by blissed (01-02-12 02:10:20)
(Self made tycoon and independant financial advisor to the stars)
Offline