You are not logged in.
I haven't seen all the videos, but artists on this site don't seem to use them. This is a good thing, because all that banging on the cervix by a foreign object isn't too good for reproductive health.
Offline
Unless you have scientific refrences for your claim I call bullshit on that.
You know a cock is a foriegn object to a vagina too and is actually more likely to cause a woman health issues banging away at her cervix than a well cared for dildo what with all the diseases that seman might spread.
Offline
I haven't seen all the videos, but artists on this site don't seem to use them. This is a good thing, because all that banging on the cervix by a foreign object isn't too good for reproductive health.
I had a quick Google search (albeit only a cursory one) on this and couldn't find anything to support this contention. To be honest since the cervix is designed to withstand having a 10 pound baby passed through it I wouldn't have thought it was that delicate.
I'm not sure how much actual "banging on the cervix" goes on when using a dildo either. Very little if using a vibrator previous discussions on this subject have led me to beleive.
Elfman
Last edited by The_Elfman (27-08-06 11:10:02)
Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense
Offline
Is this person a troll?
The woman is in control of how far the dildo goes in. If it starts to hurt, she'll stop. Also, if you watch women using a dildo during masturbation, they don't generally wham it in as hard as possible, just move it in and out smoothly.
Finally, many dildos are made of silicone that is almost identically firm to an erect penis (that being the point).
Offline
No I'm not a troll and there are variations to use, size etc which lessen what I am saying. But some dildos are monstrous and some even made of solid glass. I stand by my claim.
Offline
I have been fucked variously with thick core samples of quartz and other geological samplings (courtesy of a former rock-scientist lover, much-missed), glass dildos (glass-blower buddy), film cannisters and other items whose heft and hardness would be injurious in the wrong hands. Fortunately, a skilled lover can work magic with the most rudimentary of workaday objects.
Welcome to the forum, stammering. You'll find that we're an opinionated bunch but, hey, you seem to be as well ~
Under all speech that is good for any-thing there lies a silence that is better. Silence is as deep as Eternity; speech is as shallow as Time.--Thomas Carlysle
Offline
A CORE SAMPLE?!
Now that IS kinky. I love it. Maybe someday we'll get a geologist on here and show Stammering that it can be done without injury. Quartz, no less! How classy is that?
Men are often made fun of for shagging watermelons, but I have to say, women have it all over men when it comes to variety.
Offline
Siobhan you are one lucky creature, but what was wrong with these guys dicks or are you just talking about foreplay? Yeah all sorts of things go up there all right, but that doesn't mean it's not potentially dangerous.
Offline
i am the proud owner of a safe, clean, beautiful, pleasing, non-pain-inflicting glass dildo. because the surface is non-porous, it will not retain all of the nasties that, say, human skin would. someday i hope to use it in an ifm shoot, since it does the trick like other items cannot. you know, makes my "up there" feel real nice.
come on now.
Offline
Yeah the penis in or out of the the hands of the wrong person can be as venomous as a snake, but that's not my arguement. Dildos are designed to go in vaginas, but that's not what vaginas were designed for.
Offline
Pardon me for saying so, Stammering, but you really need to snap out of it.
Burlesque.
Maintain a sense of humour about it, whatever "it" is.
"Max Fan Club" Head of Security and In-house Sycophant. (Who says evil can't be a full-time occupation?)
Offline
No pardon granted. How about you snapping out of it.
Offline
Snapping out of what? I just had my coffee and am comfortably clear of mind. May I be so bold as to enquire how you yourself are feeling today?
Burlesque.
Maintain a sense of humour about it, whatever "it" is.
"Max Fan Club" Head of Security and In-house Sycophant. (Who says evil can't be a full-time occupation?)
Offline
Just great.
Offline
I'm happy to hear it. You see, I have been thinking, and come to the conclusion that the act of stating an opinion and then stubbornly repeating it again and again and again without producing a shred of proof or even circumstantial evidence must be a sign of something being amiss. It is a relief to find that I was wrong and that you are in fact feeling great.
Burlesque.
Maintain a sense of humour about it, whatever "it" is.
"Max Fan Club" Head of Security and In-house Sycophant. (Who says evil can't be a full-time occupation?)
Offline
Yeah the penis in or out of the the hands of the wrong person can be as venomous as a snake, but that's not my arguement. Dildos are designed to go in vaginas, but that's not what vaginas were designed for.
Indulge me for a moment, stammering m'love, whilst I quickly reconstruct the ulterior functions of my genitalia, which I've evidently been using with gross ignorant malfunction all these years. What pray tell, were vaginas designed for? Thrill me with your acumen.
And just as a node of friendly advice, as Burlesque sanguinely suggests, attempting the art of contention through tenacious repetition without any sort of justification or rationalisation, particularly on unfamiliar turf, is super awesome, and I would absolutely would love to engage in a spirited debate about the primary usage of female bits through this particularly useful and logical discourse.
“The trouble is I’m really a puritan at heart. All pornographers are puritans.”
“You are certainly not a pornographer,” he said.
“No, but it sounded good. I like those two p’s.
The alliteration.”
Offline
Please do not use fabricated health risks to justify your personal tastes/opinions.
I agree that dildos are designed to penetrate vaginas and they are also designed to do it safely.
Last edited by Cate (28-08-06 10:16:47)
Offline
Wooo a lot of artillery here. I am not using fabricated health risks and they are not part of my personal tastes and opinions. There are two things I'm basing my issue on but you are all so fucking clever here that I thought that they would stick out like bulls balls for you. How wrong I was. Firstly I live with a doctor who spends most of the time sorting out serious gynacaelogical issues with young under 30s women. Secondly all I have done is state how good it was that nobody (I have seen yet) on this site has used a dildo. Well go sort it.
Offline
i can't wait til my vagina does what it's really designed for: making babies. i guess it is a bit silly of me to be sticking things in it when what i really want is a nice deposit of babyjuice - that's what i was made for, anyway.
troll alert.
Offline
i can't wait til my vagina does what it's really designed for: making babies. i guess it is a bit silly of me to be sticking things in it when what i really want is a nice deposit of babyjuice - that's what i was made for, anyway.
troll alert.
Hmmmmmmmmmm .................. I think I have
some of that "babyjuice" you're looking for
Ashmedi is an ancient god of rage and lust.
I don't feel rage, but the lust part fits like a glove.
"Isn't this a lovely day my friend ?
Just watch some b@st@rd screw it up"
Offline
yikes.
Offline
"Highway To Your Womb": Bad lysergic Ken Russell faux-porn?
“The trouble is I’m really a puritan at heart. All pornographers are puritans.”
“You are certainly not a pornographer,” he said.
“No, but it sounded good. I like those two p’s.
The alliteration.”
Offline
When I was young (mid teens) I used to be terrified of hurting them. I would ask girls "Is it OK? Am I hurting you?". I suppose I equated senisitivity with fragility. It took me a while to get over this.
Elfman.
Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense
Offline
Lia wrote:"Highway To Your Womb": Bad lysergic Ken Russell faux-porn?
I admit that it might be a tortuous trail in the mountains, or a breadwinner for others, nevertheless it's a pipe which makes run much ink among other fluids.
Btw, are you a member of the highway police dpt? The monolog of the vagina was written by a lady, what a mess if written by a man destituted of it...
It just sounds so deliciously, amusingly like one of the euphemisms which quibbled surreptitiously out of Anais Nin's quill, like "delta of Venus", up there with such coy vulvic vignettes as "quim" and "pudenda", which I spout frequently with as much irony, spittle and glee as I can muster. I just have a rather vulgarian penchant for pseudo-highbrow avant-garde vaginal euphemisms.
Oy vey, had it been written by a man, it would have been an artistic Chernobyl. The only male I've ever really known to both masterfully and electrifyingly channel and verbally harness female sexuality was Henry Miller, bless the lovely pervert, whose hardboiled phraseology of choice, true to his hardboiled gritty form, was always "cunt". It was though he had spent his life as a flaneurish literary gynaecologist, studying every crevice and every churn and every nuance of quim.
“The trouble is I’m really a puritan at heart. All pornographers are puritans.”
“You are certainly not a pornographer,” he said.
“No, but it sounded good. I like those two p’s.
The alliteration.”
Offline
When I was young (mid teens) I used to be terrified of hurting them. I would ask girls "Is it OK? Am I hurting you?". I suppose I equated senisitivity with fragility. It took me a while to get over this.
And I was the one urging them to go harder and deeper.
“The trouble is I’m really a puritan at heart. All pornographers are puritans.”
“You are certainly not a pornographer,” he said.
“No, but it sounded good. I like those two p’s.
The alliteration.”
Offline