Why the IFM tease?

hmabhmab · 21-05-11 21:16:47

Although an orgasm or two may be reached during a showing, it is still a tease especially when the storyline isn't complete. Two exceptional bodies of work would have had more impact if it was displayed in its entirety; I am speaking of the Molten series and the Stripped series. These are not the only bodies of work that, if shown in their entirety, would be more impacting and less frustrating. Its as if you are allowing the viewer to be stimulated but you pull out just before they achieve their pleasure. I love the girls and the way they share their gifts of pleasure, but jumping from one video to the next to complete a storyline to achieve the ultimate end is just too frustrating. The cinematography is award winning, so why not tell the whole story in one showing.

xxEPxx · 21-05-11 21:31:22

I suppose one answer/theory is that the IFM contributions aren't necessarily designed to fulfill the viewer's own masturbatory experience, as is often the case with mainstream porn (the corny structure and length purposely intended to fit in with a wank for the watcher).

Then again, I could be wrong!

xxEPxx

Xebeche · 22-05-11 03:06:34

Another reason, while less sublime, could be that it really just sucks when your subscription has lapsed and you haven't decided whether or not to re-subscribe, and then Gala and Chica create this film, basically forcing me to pay up. Damn them for being so hot.

Remember, in theaters, even Ben-Hur had an intermission...

hmabhmab · 22-05-11 03:16:50

Xebeche wrote:

Another reason, while less sublime, could be that it really just sucks when your subscription has lapsed and you haven't decided whether or not to re-subscribe, and then Gala and Chica create this film, basically forcing me to pay up. Damn them for being so hot.
Remember, in theaters, even Ben-Hur had an intermission...

[...]

hmabhmab your response has been moderated. Please read the Sticky thread about forum etiquette.

Xebeche · 22-05-11 05:41:45

Did you want to say that something I said bothered you or made you bristle? Feel free. I'm sure we can discuss it and clear things up. It could just be a case of misunderstood or misheard communication that was accidental on either of our parts.

Since your name says "new member" not "Moderator" or some such title - I'm assuming you actually are not Bobby, Viva or Richard incognito. As such, your impersonation of authority is in especially bad taste - especially here where the people with authority are so laid back.

Welcome to IFM, by the way.

troyforyou · 22-05-11 06:35:59

I think it was Hmabhmab that was moderated.

richard · 22-05-11 08:11:18

Yes that's right.

Xebeche · 22-05-11 08:40:10

My bad, usually Richard et al. post that it's them. Apologies.

aven frey · 23-05-11 01:09:56

Just for the record I don't moderate anymore, haven't for a long time! Thankless and annoying job, which is why Richard is the only one who does it now.

There is at least one orgasm in every video, as far as I can tell anyways. Sometimes ladies can have many and in the duets this is pretty common. They're split up because if they were not you'd be missing out on most of everything that was shot because the videos need to be kept to a practical length.

#1 21-05-11 21:16:47

Why the IFM tease?

#2 21-05-11 21:31:22

Re: Why the IFM tease?

#3 22-05-11 03:06:34

Re: Why the IFM tease?

#4 22-05-11 03:16:50

Re: Why the IFM tease?

#5 22-05-11 05:41:45

Re: Why the IFM tease?

#6 22-05-11 06:35:59

Re: Why the IFM tease?

#7 22-05-11 08:11:18

Re: Why the IFM tease?

#8 22-05-11 08:40:10

Re: Why the IFM tease?

#9 23-05-11 01:09:56

Re: Why the IFM tease?

Board footer