You Too?

LoverofPOV · 08-08-24 06:28:43

Hi.
Do you also masturbate when you watch sex videos?
(I do.)

I wonder if there are also other men here who like to feel as if they are the one making love to the woman appearing on their screen. Seeing her laying on her back in front of you on the bed, while you are making love in missionary position, or with her riding you in cowgirl while she's looking you in the eyes. As if you are the one giving her that pleasure, while she is giving the same pleasure to you...
Especially when she is about to have an orgasm, and you can make yourself come together with her. As if the hand you are masturbating yourself with were her vagina squeezing your member...

As you probably know, that filming technique is called Point of View. The lover films his beloved as he sees her while they are making love.

Usually POV is only filmed partially the way I like it. But instead of enumerating the things I don't like about the commercially made POV videos as well as the POV videos made by amateurs, I would like to share a rare exception made by an amateur, and only a fragment is filmed as I would like to see a whole video filmed. When the woman rides the man, and when they are making love with her laying on her back.
The video shows up under the below title on various porn sites.
(I hope her husband is only calling her a "Slut" and a "Whore" when it excites them while having sex. He sure knows how to film her though.) The part I like appears From 4:17 to 6:56.

"EXTREME GRANNY MARRIED SLUT LESLIE SUCKS, LICKS AND CUMS LIKE A CHEATING WHORE WIFE ON DADDY'S THICK COCK"

All her husband had to do is hold the camera steady and close enough to his body so the whole of her body appears on the screen. Which is why I like that video, as it shows the whole of her body on the screen at the same time, her excited face near the top, and her pussy near the bottom of the screen. (Not in parts with the camera scanning the body up and down in near close up.)

He could also have set his camera on a tripod or something behind his head while laying on his back and she was riding him, facing him and the camera. That way he would have had both hands free to hold and caress her. But maybe then she would have appeared less close by, less intimate to us.

I wonder if there are other men here who would also like to see ladies being filmed by their husbands and boyfriends just like Leslie was from 4:17 to 6:56.

TZO_2K18 · 15-09-24 20:21:01

(WARNING: This is a long read, please do not skim, or you'll lose the context of the post…)

I can only speak for myself and other voyeuristic viewers of porn, so unlike **vicarious viewers, I do NOT get any vicarious pleasure from seeing some dude rutting and grunting as that's what I see when I see mainstream porn, and it's the very reason why I come to this site in the first place instead of the glut of literally billions of porn sites that feature men pounding away relentlessly with a prop…

**(They are just as legit as voyeuristic viewers, by the way…)

As that's what a woman's role is in 90% of adult films, a prop with boobs, an asshole, and her vagina, as that's all mainstream porn is concerned with, just those 3 parts of a woman, and it doesn't matter who the woman is, or what she's doing which is why I prefer FECK, cam sites, and masturbation videos featuring women with a camera on a tripod!

… Which is far superior to 90% of all mainstream adult entertainment filmed by lesser men…

Hand-held cams are shit as there are only two or three men alive on planet earth filming mainstream adult media that has the self-control to keep the fuckin' cam still and the model in the frame, as most assholes end up swinging the camera all over the place just to see what *his* DICK wants to, no matter what the woman is doing at the time!

It's really infuriating when the shit camera-work wildly swings/zooms AWAY from the wide shot of her incredibly sensuous full-body orgasm to something completely unrelated, like her breasts or feet, only returning the wide-shot when she's done with the orgasm, I mean, we miss 80% of sensuality for smut… it's why FECK should be the fuckin' standard for adult entertainment, not just an outlier!

GREAT camera-work always represents documenting the subject rather than dominating it, (Unless you're being stylistic such as with music videos/film) unlike with 90% of adult entertainment as it has a low standard for camera operators, I can say with no hyperbole, that you can literally train a chimpanzee to have the same standard that is no different from your average mainstream porn cameraman!

Sorry about the rant, but the vast majority of POV videos worth their salt are made by women who self-shoot, or have shot the scene, as for the most part they see the models as women, rather than fuckin' props which makes the videos much more sensuous to view for voyeuristic viewers of adult content!

As vicarious viewers have no problem when a guy's balls are taking up 60% of the screen as they're not really watching the video as much as using it as a guide for their imagination…

The fact of the matter is that vicarious viewers represent the norm, and its standard is set for 90% of mainstream adult entertainment which wouldn't be bad were it not for the fact that it's made by and for men that sees women as nothing more than sexual props to play with while only concerned with her three parts; the vagina, breasts and asshole, as that's what a woman's role and person is reduced to…

Therefore, this site is unfortunately an outlier of pure sensuality **made by and featuring women, not props with erogenous parts, sailing in a sea of worthless smut created by and for a mainstream standard set by lesser men…

**(And Richard, who should be commended forever and often for his magnificent contribution to adult entertainment!)

Thank FUCK, for FECK!

Last edited by TZO_2K18 (15-09-24 20:32:39)

tuboman81 · 16-09-24 20:43:46

TZO_2K18 wrote:

(WARNING: This is a long read, please do not skim, or you'll lose the context of the post…)
I can only speak for myself and other voyeuristic viewers of porn, so unlike **vicarious viewers, I do NOT get any vicarious pleasure from seeing some dude rutting and grunting as that's what I see when I see mainstream porn, and it's the very reason why I come to this site in the first place instead of the glut of literally billions of porn sites that feature men pounding away relentlessly with a prop…
**(They are just as legit as voyeuristic viewers, by the way…)
As that's what a woman's role is in 90% of adult films, a prop with boobs, an asshole, and her vagina, as that's all mainstream porn is concerned with, just those 3 parts of a woman, and it doesn't matter who the woman is, or what she's doing which is why I prefer FECK, cam sites, and masturbation videos featuring women with a camera on a tripod!
… Which is far superior to 90% of all mainstream adult entertainment filmed by lesser men…
Hand-held cams are shit as there are only two or three men alive on planet earth filming mainstream adult media that has the self-control to keep the fuckin' cam still and the model in the frame, as most assholes end up swinging the camera all over the place just to see what *his* DICK wants to, no matter what the woman is doing at the time!
It's really infuriating when the shit camera-work wildly swings/zooms AWAY from the wide shot of her incredibly sensuous full-body orgasm to something completely unrelated, like her breasts or feet, only returning the wide-shot when she's done with the orgasm, I mean, we miss 80% of sensuality for smut… it's why FECK should be the fuckin' standard for adult entertainment, not just an outlier!
GREAT camera-work always represents documenting the subject rather than dominating it, (Unless you're being stylistic such as with music videos/film) unlike with 90% of adult entertainment as it has a low standard for camera operators, I can say with no hyperbole, that you can literally train a chimpanzee to have the same standard that is no different from your average mainstream porn cameraman!
Sorry about the rant, but the vast majority of POV videos worth their salt are made by women who self-shoot, or have shot the scene, as for the most part they see the models as women, rather than fuckin' props which makes the videos much more sensuous to view for voyeuristic viewers of adult content!
As vicarious viewers have no problem when a guy's balls are taking up 60% of the screen as they're not really watching the video as much as using it as a guide for their imagination…
The fact of the matter is that vicarious viewers represent the norm, and its standard is set for 90% of mainstream adult entertainment which wouldn't be bad were it not for the fact that it's made by and for men that sees women as nothing more than sexual props to play with while only concerned with her three parts; the vagina, breasts and asshole, as that's what a woman's role and person is reduced to…
Therefore, this site is unfortunately an outlier of pure sensuality **made by and featuring women, not props with erogenous parts, sailing in a sea of worthless smut created by and for a mainstream standard set by lesser men…
**(And Richard, who should be commended forever and often for his magnificent contribution to adult entertainment!)
Thank FUCK, for FECK!

Cheers! You nailed exactly what I have always disliked about mainstream porn and how it views/portrays women!! I am so glad I found IFM early on in my adolescent years and have always used it as a source of entertainment, education and pleasure!!

TZO_2K18 · 22-09-24 21:34:39

tuboman81 wrote:

Cheers! You nailed exactly what I have always disliked about mainstream porn and how it views/portrays women!! I am so glad I found IFM early on in my adolescent years and have always used it as a source of entertainment, education and pleasure!!

COOL, it's good to not be alone in this, and its standard should be the default, as it's far more sensually erotic when watching an entire full-body orgasm, than just staring into the genitals.

Sure they're hot in their own right, but it does get rather boring than just exclusively focusing on the genitalia…

privignus · 23-09-24 00:03:53

I think I posted before that many men seem scared of sexuality and women and the feelings they bring out. I think that a lot of ugly porn is made for guys like that.

Some women sometimes like to be turned into objects because it gets them out of their heads. I think that BDSM is often a way of seeking altered states of consciousness like intense dancing or substance use. Not all ugly porn is that way, but some is.

(Some people like to be called slut in sex games but it gets used so widely in many kinds of porn).

Last edited by privignus (23-09-24 00:55:53)

alsbosilver · 23-09-24 08:42:36

"I wonder if there are other men here who would also like to see ladies being filmed by their husbands and boyfriends just like Leslie was from 4:17 to 6:56. smile" says LoverofPOV

where can we find this video??

Thank you !

Christian (France)

smoothed · 23-09-24 09:56:49

alsbosilver wrote:

"I wonder if there are other men here who would also like to see ladies being filmed by their husbands and boyfriends just like Leslie was from 4:17 to 6:56. smile" says LoverofPOV
where can we find this video??
Thank you !
Christian (France)

The video he's referring to isn't an IFM video.

TZO_2K18 · 23-09-24 20:03:37

privignus wrote:

I think I posted before that many men seem scared of sexuality and women and the feelings they bring out. I think that a lot of ugly porn is made for guys like that.
Some women sometimes like to be turned into objects because it gets them out of their heads. I think that BDSM is often a way of seeking altered states of consciousness like intense dancing or substance use. Not all ugly porn is that way, but some is.
(Some people like to be called slut in sex games but it gets used so widely in many kinds of porn).

Indeed, and it is exactly what you posted which I never mentioned in my last post as it was a post that illustrates what I despise so much in porn!

And it's not a post where I condone and/or champion such preferences as a healthy/respectful way to experience/view/create porn.

(As such a post would be so large that it would bust IFM's servers with text alone! ;^D)

privignus · 28-09-24 22:24:50

A problem with the uncurated 'site for everything' with suggested content is that it will be dominated by the most popular things which are pretty dreadful. Offline, the Weekly World News is different from the Globe and Mail is different from a specialty paper for the steel industry, they show you different things. I don't know the porn tube sites well but it seems like the old Internet discussions were better for helping people who liked a thing find more of it.

Its fun to see whole-body shakes in an orgasm.

#1 08-08-24 06:28:43

You Too?

#2 15-09-24 20:21:01

Re: You Too?

#3 16-09-24 20:43:46

Re: You Too?

#4 22-09-24 21:34:39

Re: You Too?

#5 23-09-24 00:03:53

Re: You Too?

#6 23-09-24 08:42:36

Re: You Too?

#7 23-09-24 09:56:49

Re: You Too?

#8 23-09-24 20:03:37

Re: You Too?

#9 28-09-24 22:24:50

Re: You Too?

Board footer