Let's talk about sex...and other stuff.

You are not logged in.

  1. Index
  2. » general discussion
  3. » Cuantity vs quality

#1 30-04-14 05:57:24

jirizarry82
Member
Registered: 15-03-14
Posts: 8

Cuantity vs quality

Hello, I have being part of IFM for a month or so now. I paid for the 3 months membership and I feel this is a rip off. Deceiving thumbnails and too many videos not worth being here. I have seen some great videos but most of the good videos are avalible for free. Honestly there are too many videos from girls that look dirty and like drug users. I just hope that somebody from IFM notice that having those bad videos do not help the website prove what they are advertising. Remember sometimes quality is better than cuantity.

Offline

#2 30-04-14 06:58:22

viva
pretty pretty princess
Registered: 14-05-10
Posts: 4,113
Website

Re: Cuantity vs quality

I thought the needles-and-mud pit we provide our contributors pre-shoot was really effective for relaxation but it seems we've gone too far sad

I'm sorry Jizziary82 sad

Offline

#3 30-04-14 07:05:27

viva
pretty pretty princess
Registered: 14-05-10
Posts: 4,113
Website

Re: Cuantity vs quality

Re: deceiving thumbnails - we try to pull them straight from the video itself, but unfortunately, the thumbnails are also drug addicts and therefore tend to lie compulsively sad

Offline

#4 30-04-14 07:25:52

Laney
Member
Registered: 25-03-13
Posts: 1,227
Website

Re: Cuantity vs quality

1268853981591.jpg?1268854427

Offline

#5 30-04-14 07:48:08

jirizarry82
Member
Registered: 15-03-14
Posts: 8

Re: Cuantity vs quality

Well I have seen a lot of videos from this site and so far I am not impressed. Some of them are good but there is too much junk. It would be nice to have some categories. Like girls with tatoos, or teens, or mature, dildos or toys. All I am saying is that there is some things that could be done to make this place a better place. I love the Idea of making it realistic but It would be great if it was realistic and and also a little more selective on the participants. I feel like IFM will post anything without making sure it is a video worthy of the website.

Offline

#6 30-04-14 08:01:37

jirizarry82
Member
Registered: 15-03-14
Posts: 8

Re: Cuantity vs quality

I can not believe this!! Viva is it realy you!!! I love the way you masturbate!! You are one of the few. You look so realistic, and the way you use two hands to estimulate yourself makes it look amaizingly real. I am on a mission of understanding the female estimulation and so far I have understand many things but the thing that realy stands out is that females that use two hands looks way more realistic and they seam to enjoy a lot more their masturbation sesion.

Last edited by jirizarry82 (30-04-14 08:02:39)

Offline

#7 30-04-14 08:40:57

viva
pretty pretty princess
Registered: 14-05-10
Posts: 4,113
Website

Re: Cuantity vs quality

Hi Jizzy! I'm so glad you like my videos. Too bad you think my friends look like dirty drug users with unrealistic orgasms sad They're embarrassed to hear it after exposing themselves in such a public and vulnerable manner but hey, who cares about their feelings, right?

If you are really trying to understand female stimulation, here is a tip for you my friend. The female of the species is especially stimulated by respect.

We are a small team of people - not some faceless corporate porn site - who are doing our best to ensure that there is a place on the web for authentic, quality videos depicting non-professional erotic videos of women experiencing orgasm.

Constructive criticism is welcome (in the right venue, which is via the help form) but what you posted was insulting.

See, we know and care for all of our contributors personally. Some of them are close friends of ours. All of them have access to this forum - in fact, the point of this forum is as a place for contributors and members to interact. You have called them dirty, you have said they look like drug addicts, and you have said that they way they masturbate is unrealistic. The last statement is at best laughable, at worst, really sad. What would you, a man who has watched unrealistic porn his whole life, know about the incredible variety of ways women masturbate?

I have taken the time to write a serious reply to you because I think it's important that you know why people will disapprove of your post. Your threat, that our best videos are on the web for free, was in especially poor taste - those videos wouldn't be available at all if not for our team working hard to create those videos. The videos on the web for free are stolen, and when you watch them, you are stealing.

I am glad you decided to sign up to show your appreciation of our work, and I am sad that you feel your membership fee is a let down to you. There are so many incredible videos to watch here at IFM that surely you could not have had time to investigate them all. Therefore you problem cannot actually be the availability of quality content - but rather a misguided feeling of entitlement, that every single woman who contributes to IFM ought to be to your taste, and your exacting standards of "realism" and - oh yes - use both hands to masturbate.

You make me sad sad

Offline

#8 30-04-14 08:45:56

richard
Administrator
Registered: 14-03-06
Posts: 3,395

Re: Cuantity vs quality

jirizarry82 wrote:

Well I have seen a lot of videos from this site and so far I am not impressed. Some of them are good but there is too much junk. It would be nice to have some categories. Like girls with tatoos, or teens, or mature, dildos or toys. All I am saying is that there is some things that could be done to make this place a better place. I love the Idea of making it realistic but It would be great if it was realistic and and also a little more selective on the participants. I feel like IFM will post anything without making sure it is a video worthy of the website.

Oh thank god you're finally here, Jizzilarry.  We've been wandering ailmessly for 8 years now just waiting for special li'l YOU to come along and tell us which girls suit your taste, so we can execute all those you don't like.  Please, don't wait another minute, draw up the death list!

Offline

#9 30-04-14 08:47:21

richard
Administrator
Registered: 14-03-06
Posts: 3,395

Re: Cuantity vs quality

jirizarry82 wrote:

I can not believe this!! Viva is it realy you!!! I love the way you masturbate!! You are one of the few. You look so realistic, and the way you use two hands to estimulate yourself makes it look amaizingly real. I am on a mission of understanding the female estimulation and so far I have understand many things but the thing that realy stands out is that females that use two hands looks way more realistic and they seam to enjoy a lot more their masturbation sesion.

Obviously you have no experience with women, so how the fuck do you know what's 'realistic' and what isn't?

Offline

#10 30-04-14 08:55:43

artist_charlotte_v
Member
From: Australia
Registered: 13-10-08
Posts: 186
Website

Re: Cuantity vs quality

jirizarry82 wrote:

Honestly there are too many videos from girls that look dirty and like drug users.

Viva has said everything that I wanted to say, but with far more elegance and tact. Because she's amazing like that.

Accusing the contributors of being dirty junkies was just downright mean. Especially in a community where so many of the women who were brave enough to share their most vulnerable moments with you are active participants. As Viva said, we're pretty tight knit around here and I consider many of the other contributors my friends. Constructive criticism is one thing, being offensive is another.

Offline

#11 30-04-14 21:15:33

hartp02
Member
Registered: 10-05-08
Posts: 85

Re: Cuantity vs quality

If it helps and comforts,I really want to express my love to all IFM contributors.
Of course, to some you feel attracted more to than others,but this comment of Jirizarry makes me sad and treat daring girls like dirt what they certainly not deserve.
Hey,bloke,I dare you to wank in front of all people and camera's!
Hey.IFM people,find comfort in this saying:
They never erected a statue for a criticaster.

Philip from Holland.

Offline

#12 30-04-14 22:56:25

troyforyou
Member
Registered: 05-04-08
Posts: 956

Re: Cuantity vs quality

I've had a sub for six years and love this stuff!  Thank you so much, contributors, and Aven for slicing them up!

Now, can we all get back to wanking!

Last edited by troyforyou (30-04-14 22:57:10)

Offline

#13 01-05-14 02:43:34

artist_charlotte_v
Member
From: Australia
Registered: 13-10-08
Posts: 186
Website

Re: Cuantity vs quality

hartp02 wrote:

If it helps and comforts,I really want to express my love to all IFM contributors...

Thank you, Philip, that's very kind of you smile

troyforyou wrote:

Now, can we all get back to wanking!

Only if you use two, clean hands, Troy. It's got to be realistic and all that.

Offline

#14 01-05-14 04:36:58

jirizarry82
Member
Registered: 15-03-14
Posts: 8

Re: Cuantity vs quality

I am so glad all of you took the time to tell me how wrong you think I am. Unfortunately I live in a country where I am allowed to express myself and also to feel my self. All I am trying to make some people understand is that a lot of videos are not so good and shouldnt be here just because it doesnt make the website look good. What I mean by that is this, I am going to break it down so I can be heard right: a lot of videos dont have the best camera angle, and when they show a great angle it only last a few seconds, it would be nice to see some make up here and there, I didnt mean literaly that some of them look dirty and like drug users, what I ment is that "you are shooting a video, get yourself together and look as pretty as you can" , I like the soft light but sometimes it is too dark. Just a couple things I thing could be better.

If any of the girls felt offended that was not my intention. My intention was just to express myself and I apologize if any of my comments were in any way offensive. I hope you understand. I love the idea of real masturbation videos and it had helped my in someway to watch the videos from this site.

I have being lucky enough to have some females help me with this subject that I am studing (26 total) but I feel myself has helped too. This is not a joke and I am seriously making a research about female masturbation and that is why I joined. The only reason I started this subject is because I thought I could help the website not to satisfy my taste for videos. I watch all the videos I can as part of my study. Thanks for your time. And Viva you realy have being helpfull.

Offline

#15 01-05-14 06:28:41

richard
Administrator
Registered: 14-03-06
Posts: 3,395

Re: Cuantity vs quality

jirizarry82 wrote:

I am so glad all of you took the time to tell me how wrong you think I am. Unfortunately I live in a country where I am allowed to express myself and also to feel my self.

If you think laws about freedom of speech have any relevance, you're clueless.  In your country is it customary to approach a young woman and tell her she looks like a dirty drug user?  Or that she isn't good looking?  Is this how you interract with people?  I didn't think so.

Offline

#16 01-05-14 06:32:57

richard
Administrator
Registered: 14-03-06
Posts: 3,395

Re: Cuantity vs quality

jirizarry82 wrote:

All I am trying to make some people understand is that a lot of videos are not so good and shouldnt be here just because it doesnt make the website look good.

And all I'm trying to make you understand is you are one person and your opinions are not necessarily shared by anybody.   Is it beyond the realms of your understanding of humanity to imagine that perhaps some people like what you don't like?   

There is no good and bad, there is just personal preference.  And my preference is that you piss off and don't come back.

Offline

#17 01-05-14 06:33:46

viva
pretty pretty princess
Registered: 14-05-10
Posts: 4,113
Website

Re: Cuantity vs quality

Why is it that all the trolls seem to be making "serious research of female masturbation"? This guy is not the first to make that noble claim.

Offline

#18 01-05-14 08:01:11

jirizarry82
Member
Registered: 15-03-14
Posts: 8

Re: Cuantity vs quality

I am having so much fun!!! Now I can say I am glad I joined!! I dont know any of you personaly but I am sure you all are awesome people. I am glad I have served as a way for you all get some stress out by insulting me. I must say It does not bother me at all. Now you all can get back to your drugs and stuff because I must get to work. Have a great IFM day. XOXO

Offline

#19 01-05-14 08:04:08

viva
pretty pretty princess
Registered: 14-05-10
Posts: 4,113
Website

Re: Cuantity vs quality

Yes thanks Jizzy, being insulted by loud-voiced men without a clue about how to speak to women is always nice smile

Offline

#20 01-05-14 08:08:48

jirizarry82
Member
Registered: 15-03-14
Posts: 8

Re: Cuantity vs quality

Lol, tell me about it!! You all made laugh real hard!! Chiao :-)

Offline

#21 01-05-14 18:48:52

Aaronhalt
Member
Registered: 18-03-11
Posts: 178

Re: Cuantity vs quality

jirizarry82 wrote:

I am so glad all of you took the time to tell me how wrong you think I am. Unfortunately I live in a country where I am allowed to express myself and also to feel my self.

Ooh! This means that it's time to link to http://xkcd.com/1357/ and the observation in its alt-text that when you argue the validity of your position based on free speech, you are saying that the best defense of your position is that it's not actually illegal to express.

Which, in this case, about sums your position up.

Offline

#22 02-05-14 03:06:31

jirizarry82
Member
Registered: 15-03-14
Posts: 8

Re: Cuantity vs quality

Ahahahaha, get over it. It is obvious, I am not as smart as you. But if my opinion is what makes you smart therefore you are not so smart.

Offline

#23 02-05-14 04:30:58

aven frey
Video editor
Registered: 24-02-06
Posts: 2,577
Website

Re: Cuantity vs quality

jirizarry82 wrote:

it would be nice to see some make up here and there,

Totes can help you out babe.

DSCN1045.JPG

Offline

#24 02-05-14 04:41:07

Aaronhalt
Member
Registered: 18-03-11
Posts: 178

Re: Cuantity vs quality

aven frey wrote:
jirizarry82 wrote:

it would be nice to see some make up here and there,

Totes can help you out babe.

http://www.ifeelmyself.com/forum/images/DSCN1045.JPG

I dunno, that blush looks like it might be a drug user to me.

Offline

#25 02-05-14 06:09:04

jirizarry82
Member
Registered: 15-03-14
Posts: 8

Re: Cuantity vs quality

Ahahahahaha, lmao!!!

Offline

  1. Index
  2. » general discussion
  3. » Cuantity vs quality

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB