quick question

viva · 23-04-12 02:17:56

Do y'all dig it when I post links to articles or picture sets with or without commentary? If you do, you don't have to comment unless you're moved to, and I'll continue posting things like that whether or not folks comment. But if not there's no point in taking up space here - I have got facebooks and blogs for these things doncha know. So let me know if y'all're keen for news and links, even if they're not the most discussion-promoting kind.

Also, just wanna give a shout out to myself for a beautiful triple conjunction of y'all. Damn, gurl.

viva · 23-04-12 02:40:13

Topically I'd like to share this nice story about the perks of herpes.

blissed · 23-04-12 14:28:22

Oh I like when you post stuff here. I never hesitate too, even if it gets no response. Sometimes the forum is quiet, other times there are lots of people who like talking. I don't know that much about how everyone feels about IFM in the office from day to day but from here the site seems quite special and what happens is extraordinary. and the forum is one of those junctions where everyone isn't there for the same reason. Blogs usually have a narrow audience of like minded, but here the audience is broader so insights can be carried out of their original narrow domain. So someone who isn't that interested in a feminist blog can have their mind changed a little here.

I love Betty Dodsons mission to liberate masturbation and though perhaps not everyone agrees, I think it is the foundation of sexuality, and so the forum isn't a shameful place to avoid even if your an anonymous screen name. or if your brave enough too when you contribute. I don't hesitate to send people to the site if they need sexual information on how to please someone or to help gain them a sexual perspective they're at ease with. And there's lots of information here both visual and testimony, and conversation and interaction on the forum with people who are sharing their sexuality which is really special. I've moderated the forum for a while and I get a sense that if you work for Feck, with that familiarity you can lose track of that specialness a little, with the boredom of repetition, the deadlines, office politics and the relief of the weekend. I think the site and forum is cool.

The herpes case is interesting. Another case of our flaws saving us from someone selfish or greedy. For me liking someone and affection sit very close to sex and to just run away means you mean nothing to that person at all. The information would kill the passion for me. But a conversation and some food and a cuddle could result in kissing and caressing other parts of her while she masturbates, and a nice conclusion to this 1st imaginary encounter

.

Last edited by blissed (23-04-12 18:10:19)

WLV612 · 23-04-12 14:47:45

I personally, am a bit phobic about clicking on links. That's just me. A bit of a preface might induce me to view something.
I know IFM is squeaky clean but I always have doubts about links.
Your triple conjunction is what is referred to in this area as, "Right good English." T'aint nothin' wrong with it y'hea'?

viva · 24-04-12 01:40:30

blissed wrote:

I get a sense that if you work for Feck, with that familiarity you can lose track of that specialness a little, with the boredom of repetition, the deadlines, office politics and the relief of the weekend.

Yeah the weird thing it, it never really gets old or boring - put a mirror up in front of me man, and I'll be entertained forever. This forum can act as a conduit, or it can act as a mirror. I am looking and reading and discussing these things either way, full time, on the weekend, after work, afk, etc - so I just wondered if folks prefer me to tailor what I post to be more specific to ifm and discussion-able topics, or if they like to see my endless brain-feed of things I found worth the 50 seconds it took to peruse them.

WLV, I get your link phobia, I'll be sure to specify if I'm linking to a dodgy/ad-filled place.

blissed · 24-04-12 02:13:34

Oh I'd go for the brain feed thanks

.

viva · 24-04-12 02:40:59

sad brain feed

excellent pervocracy article on abuse.

blissed · 24-04-12 11:28:40

Good cases for social worker intervention. In the same way social workers help children at risk, everyone in those scenarios is at risk.

If traffic lights in a street are malfunctioning that puts everyone at risk and if reported to the cops will be reported to a specialist to fix immediately. So why not referr social risk to a specialist. Sometimes abuse isn't physical but there's a risk that violence could develop.

All of the stories in this article could be referred to a specialist . If funding is a problem try and quantify the money spent on medical treatment and the material cost of destructive behaviour (days off work, or under performing at work, psychological effect on children )

Also educating kids and adults to know that they can call a specialist who can sensitively help both the abuser and abused.

.

WLV612 · 24-04-12 19:45:27

Sadly those who are abused cling to those justifications and make them real and often are damaged from the outset and so it's the frying pan you do know for fear of the fire you don't.
And of course, abusers don't limit their physical violence to partners and that's even more frightening. An abused child often goes on to become an abuser so it's a vicious cycle.

Don't make a decision on what and how to post based on anything but your own inclinations.
IFM is highly rated for it's security and yet the 'net offers an endless number of stupid viruses that can destroy a hard drive. Hence, the linkophobia.
As I mentioned over across the room, I consider you to be one of IFM's power forwards not only for your vids but you posting activity and your humor and intellect.

Last edited by WLV612 (25-04-12 11:52:38)

artemesia · 25-04-12 00:22:04

Ohhh, I have to say these are great links. Can I give special kudos to the trigger warning on the second link? I haven't read it yet, but I think it's kinda important when talking about sex to realise not everyone is in the best place to process information. I love your link posting Viva, it's just that I don't get to read stuff till I get home and it's late at night... xx

WLV612 · 25-04-12 11:53:57

artemesia wrote:

I haven't read it yet, but I think it's kinda important when talking about sex to realise not everyone is in the best place to process information.

Well stated.

Billdrummer · 23-07-12 06:26:03

I love this site, and intend to be a paying member for some time.

Just for the record, rest assured that I will not strip content and repost it elsewhere.

I'd like some help. A Solo studio clip showed the artist shaking with passion with her legs open, lying on purple or burgundy bedding. Who is she? She rivals Strawberry (Chloe) in orgasmic responsiveness.

Thank you again for maintaining the integrity of your mission!

Last edited by Billdrummer (23-07-12 06:29:21)

viva · 23-07-12 06:42:42

Hey Bill, would love to help but that's a very vague description - almost every contribution involves a bit of passionate shaking and a good bunch of studio shoots have purple sheets. Any other details you can provide? Do you know (even vaguely) when the shoot was released? Do you remember the woman's hair color/style?

harcos2012 · 24-07-12 13:45:12

I don't check the General Discussions every time I visit IFM, but I do like to see what others are interested in. Knowing a little bit about what folks think about, aside from IFM and sex, makes them more real for me. I often wonder what folks would be like if I were to meet them in a coffee shop or pass them in the supermarket, and just chat for a few minutes. The links fill a little bit of that curiosity.

But I don't follow all the links for the reasons other have stated.

As for anonymity on IFM or elsewhere, screen names are fine, and I know that the women who contribute here are just as anonymous as the people who visit the site from outside Feck enterprises. We outside visitors know that if anyone wanted to find out our real identities, they could probably do so without much effort. Everyone has to live with that. (I don't think the reverse necessarily is true - we outsiders probably couldn't discover the real identities of Feck contributors - but that's okay. I don't need to know.)

Billdrummer · 26-08-12 07:23:50

viva wrote:

Hey Bill, would love to help but that's a very vague description - almost every contribution involves a bit of passionate shaking and a good bunch of studio shoots have purple sheets. Any other details you can provide? Do you know (even vaguely) when the shoot was released? Do you remember the woman's hair color/style?

Hiya, I found the clip I described--it's "Whole" by Maiya. One thing I did notice was that I truly enjoyed the hunt!

richard · 26-08-12 07:55:15

harcos2012 wrote:

As for anonymity on IFM or elsewhere, screen names are fine, and I know that the women who contribute here are just as anonymous as the people who visit the site from outside Feck enterprises. We outside visitors know that if anyone wanted to find out our real identities, they could probably do so without much effort. Everyone has to live with that. (I don't think the reverse necessarily is true - we outsiders probably couldn't discover the real identities of Feck contributors - but that's okay. I don't need to know.)

FYI Harcos I'm the only one at Feck who access the member databases, not that I wouldn't trust the staff to as well. I think it would be very difficult, virtually impossible for anyone in nestpace to find out your true identity.

WLV612 · 26-08-12 12:37:34

A bit of research will show anyone the high marks Feck get's as an internet entity. On my part, I'd have not concern if the staff had access. High standards are found in every aspect of Feck's business and of course the end result is pretty impressive to us, the members.

#1 23-04-12 02:17:56

quick question

#2 23-04-12 02:40:13

Re: quick question

#3 23-04-12 14:28:22

Re: quick question

#4 23-04-12 14:47:45

Re: quick question

#5 24-04-12 01:40:30

Re: quick question

#6 24-04-12 02:13:34

Re: quick question

#7 24-04-12 02:40:59

Re: quick question

#8 24-04-12 11:28:40

Re: quick question

#9 24-04-12 19:45:27

Re: quick question

#10 25-04-12 00:22:04

Re: quick question

#11 25-04-12 11:53:57

Re: quick question

#12 23-07-12 06:26:03

Re: quick question

#13 23-07-12 06:42:42

Re: quick question

#14 24-07-12 13:45:12

Re: quick question

#15 26-08-12 07:23:50

Re: quick question

#16 26-08-12 07:55:15

Re: quick question

#17 26-08-12 12:37:34

Re: quick question

Board footer