#1 28-05-24 04:49:53

redzephyr

Member

Registered: 14-01-24

Posts: 6

Technical question re shooting p** videos

How do you protect the mattresses?!!

richard

Administrator

Registered: 14-03-06

Posts: 3,356

Re: Technical question re shooting p** videos

A rubber-backed mattress protector made for bed wetters

Hangdog90

Member

Registered: 24-01-16

Posts: 1,578

Re: Technical question re shooting p** videos

Is the word "p e e " now censored on this site? Yesterday in posting transcripts I noticed that the word was changed, to "ejaculation" when I posted. It did not happen at the time of typing, but when posted.

Has self-censorship really reached this preposterous level?

EDIT: This post confirms that yes, the word is not only censored but changed to a word with a completely different meaning.

Last edited by Hangdog90 (31-05-24 19:57:36)

richard

Administrator

Registered: 14-03-06

Posts: 3,356

Re: Technical question re shooting p** videos

We experimented with this a few months ago but didn't go ahead with it, but when the forum update was installed, it seems to have become active.  Will try to fix it.

Just trying to keep IFM alive.  As you can see from our billing page we have one foot in the grave already.

Hangdog90

Member

Registered: 24-01-16

Posts: 1,578

Re: Technical question re shooting p** videos

We experimented with this a few months ago but didn't go ahead with it, but when the forum update was installed, it seems to have become active.  Will try to fix it.

Just trying to keep IFM alive.  As you can see from our billing page we have one foot in the grave already.

It seems to me that you are being treated unfairly, and not the same as other sites. Because of the way CCBILL have treated you, you have compromised your offer significantly by restricting p i s s  content, removing even the slightest discussion about menstruation and taking down films that contain the most mild BDSM content online.

IFM is a site that has always been respectful of women and content producers. Anyone who catws to look back through the history can see that. Yet you are being damaged in a seemingly capricious and unjust way.

To underline this, I looked at a website that operates with Faphouse and Xhamster, called Jade Kink. Their payments are handled by CCBill. But their content I would describe as very rough and misogynistic. The woman is humiliated verbally, deep throated until she gags, punched in the head while being fucked, made to degrade herself verbally, is regularly bruised on the buttocks and legs and even has a black eye in some scenes. She is urinated on in a few scenes and forced to perform analingus for a long time un another, while being sat upon in a way that makes her gasp for air.

How can this content be okay with CCBill while your artistic BDSM solo scenes are not?

Needless to say I atill dispute the entire premise that companies like CCBill are taking to themselves arbitrary powers to make international laws.

Last edited by Hangdog90 (02-06-24 01:14:59)

richard

Administrator

Registered: 14-03-06

Posts: 3,356

Re: Technical question re shooting p** videos

We experimented with this a few months ago but didn't go ahead with it, but when the forum update was installed, it seems to have become active.  Will try to fix it.

Just trying to keep IFM alive.  As you can see from our billing page we have one foot in the grave already.

It seems to me that you are being treated unfairly, and not the same as other sites. Because of the way CCBILL have treated you, you have compromised your offer significantly by restricting p i s s  content, removing even the slightest discussion about menstruation and taking down films that contain the most mild BDSM content online.

IFM is a site that has always been respectful of women and content producers. Anyone who catws to look back through the history can see that. Yet you are being damaged in a seemingly capricious and unjust way.

To underline this, I looked at a website that operates with Faphouse and Xhamster, called Jade Kink. Their payments are handled by CCBill. But their content I would describe as very rough and misogynistic. The woman is humiliated verbally, deep throated until she gags, punched in the head while being fucked, made to degrade herself verbally, is regularly bruised on the buttocks and legs and even has a black eye in some scenes. She is urinated on in a few scenes and forced to perform analingus for a long time un another, while being sat upon in a way that makes her gasp for air.

How can this content be okay with CCBill while your artistic BDSM solo scenes are not?

Needless to say I atill dispute the entire premise that companies like CCBill are taking to themselves arbitrary powers to make international laws.

If you send me a message through the Contact form I will explain it in more detail.  It's not a topic for public discussion.

redzephyr

Member

Registered: 14-01-24

Posts: 6

Re: Technical question re shooting p** videos

I should point out (I've been away a few weeks): I'm the op, I self-censored in the title - this was not IFM's doing

Hangdog90

Member

Registered: 24-01-16

Posts: 1,578

Re: Technical question re shooting p** videos

I should point out (I've been away a few weeks): I'm the op, I self-censored in the title - this was not IFM's doing

In fact by using asterisks instead of vowels, you bypassed a new algorithm that converts that word to "ejaculate". Not only does this happen for all new instances, but all previous instances of the word in the forum archives were converted to "ejaculate".

richard

Administrator

Registered: 14-03-06

Posts: 3,356

Re: Technical question re shooting p** videos

I should point out (I've been away a few weeks): I'm the op, I self-censored in the title - this was not IFM's doing

In fact by using asterisks instead of vowels, you bypassed a new algorithm that converts that word to "ejaculate". Not only does this happen for all new instances, but all previous instances of the word in the forum archives were converted to "ejaculate".

No that's disabled.

blue_summer

Member

Registered: 21-11-22

Posts: 7

Re: Technical question re shooting p** videos

We experimented with this a few months ago but didn't go ahead with it, but when the forum update was installed, it seems to have become active.  Will try to fix it.

Just trying to keep IFM alive.  As you can see from our billing page we have one foot in the grave already.

damn that's depressing to hear. ifm is one of the only porn sites -- well, websites in general -- that actually make me feel better having using it. the aesthetic is top notch. i guess there's less 'novelty' to the videos in 2024, since the broader public does seem less ignorant about sexuality, plus the rise of onlyfans/etc. but onlyfans is mcdonalds. this stuff is Quality Content, regardless of current financial viability, that no other site can really compete with; god willing the trends will swing back in this direction.