How many people are into feet?

sa2018 · 11-05-18 02:45:44

Hi everyone,

I'm very curious---how many of you are "into" feet? I've always been very turned on by female feet, pretty much since I can remember noticing girls at all (I'm a male). But, I'm not sure how I feel about the term "fetish"...sometimes it sounds more like a diagnosis than something fun! For me, it's definitely something fun; as soon as I discovered how to have an orgasm as a pre-teen, I craved looking at sexy feet (usually in the drab lingerie section of a mail-order catolog...a far-cry from today's teens wanking to PornHub!). Warm weather during the school year made for delightfully torturous class periods stealing glances at the girls slipping their feet in and out of their mary janes or (even more exciting) deliberately bending down to unbuckle their sandals and prop their fully naked soles up on the seat in front of them. That said, I don't need feet to get off, but it makes getting off way more fun! I love rubbing, licking, and sucking a woman's toes. I don't know how common this is for "foot guys," but I also find my own feet to be a very powerful erogenous zone, and luckily my wife doesn't mind giving them some attention now and then.

What about you? Do you like feet? How much? Would you say it's a "fetish"? Do you like to worship your partner's feet? Have yours worshiped? Have you had partners who were into it?

xoxo
Sa

_hyperballad_ · 11-05-18 05:55:19

Oh boy do I have a mega treat for you!

Look up @abstractfeet on instagram

viva · 11-05-18 09:08:52

I love my own feet! and love being with a man who thinks they're beautiful. holding them and stroking them. i would love it if a man wanted to paint my nails and choose the colour. I'm a pisces so my feet are my special

Callisthenes · 03-07-18 14:55:17

Just can't take my eyes off Junipur's Video Diary 8 ...

richard · 04-07-18 03:46:24

viva wrote:

I love my own feet! and love being with a man who thinks they're beautiful. holding them and stroking them. i would love it if a man wanted to paint my nails and choose the colour. I'm a pisces so my feet are my special

Ok wait wait wait. So now, the date of your birth affects your feet?

viva · 04-07-18 22:20:54

yes, the stars fall down at my feet

viva · 04-07-18 22:21:59

each astrological sign is associated with part of the body of course!

Tuxxie · 05-07-18 21:40:16

viva wrote:

yes, the stars fall down at my feet

LOL!!

Women's feet are not the primary turn on for me however, I do tend to notice feet. Usually petite, pretty toes, trimmed nails - get me going more. And I do notice feet movement during masturbation (ie - the clenching and stretching of toes. To me, it's all an extension of what the body is experiencing.

richard · 06-07-18 06:45:25

viva wrote:

each astrological sign is associated with part of the body of course!

Which astrological sign is associated with people who have a rational world view and reject pseudo-science and spurious personality profiling? Who use their minds to think and consider the source of information and evaluate how valid it might be rather than believe things because "somebody said so" when all those somebodies can't even agree? Who recognise when they're being conned into submission or manipulated for profit by information which can easily be recognised as false with just a little contemplation?

viva · 08-07-18 15:38:03

richard wrote:

viva wrote:
each astrological sign is associated with part of the body of course!
Which astrological sign is associated with people who have a rational world view and reject pseudo-science and spurious personality profiling?

That would be the "bos taurus", often known by its common name, the "party pooping bull".

Rose_P · 10-07-18 07:16:40

richard wrote:

viva wrote:
each astrological sign is associated with part of the body of course!
Which astrological sign is associated with people who have a rational world view and reject pseudo-science and spurious personality profiling? Who use their minds to think and consider the source of information and evaluate how valid it might be rather than believe things because "somebody said so" when all those somebodies can't even agree? Who recognise when they're being conned into submission or manipulated for profit by information which can easily be recognised as false with just a little contemplation?

I believe I read something in the forum rules along the lines of "so keep your comments positive where you can, and non-existent where you can’t". But hey, it's your forum. <3

richard · 10-07-18 07:51:59

I really can't imagine what you mean, that was a sincere enquiry! Surely at least one of the signs must have those traits, otherwise either (1) nobody does or (2) some people are not assigned a star sign at all.

http://skeptico.blogs.com/skeptico/2005 … ogy_c.html

Frances · 10-07-18 09:00:48

I went and searched my own after reading this thread and found it quite interesting- It made me search my own star sign (scorpio) and for me the sexual organs/ reproductive system..erotic video editor..coincidence or nay?

Alatarius · 10-07-18 11:42:00

Frances wrote:

I went and searched my own after reading this thread and found it quite interesting- It made me search my own star sign (scorpio) and for me the sexual organs/ reproductive system..erotic video editor..coincidence or nay?

If someone claims that there is some special connection between a star sign and a body part, how, in your opinion, could we go about to investigate if that claim actually is true? Suppose that we made a survey of at least a couple of thousand totally randomly selected persons, to investigate whether erotic video editors, sexual therapists, gynaecologist and similar occupations are over-represented amongst people born between October 23 and November 22 compared to the population at large, would the result of such an investigation at all influence whether you believe that your own occupation (and birth date) is a "coincidence" or not?

viva · 10-07-18 17:37:01

Alatarius - I'm not sure if your question to Frances is genuine or not, but honestly, finding meaning in stars and horoscopes and numbers on the clock and images and events isn't about reproducible scientific objective fact. it's about heart and magic, feeling and wonder, the joy and pleasure of encountering spiritual or emotional moments in the midst of everyday life. it's about telling our stories, it's about bonding, it's about intuition and the intersection of linguistic representations of reality with our own inclinations and wordless, emotional experience of self.

such a study as you propose would definitely be interesting, but to be real, when you ask for data-based proof about astrology, you're kind of missing the point.

Richard, your enquiry was not sincere. Your 'enquiry' was snide. it implied, heavy-handed, that people who believe in astrology are gullible, unintelligent and do not have rational world-views. Your connection to faith and belief are not the same as mine, but that doesn't mean I'm not intelligent or rational.

When Frances says it's amazing that her star sign is associated with sexuality, and she is actually such a sexual person that even her career reflects that, i think that's very cool. I'm not at all concerned with whether or not the position of the stars ACKCHUALLY made Frances as hot as she is. I'm more interested in the connections she made between herself and the story, and the fact that she piped up and told me about them. The connection she made tells me more about Frances.

when you're sitting around complaining about how people find joy and meaning in the world, you're missing out on a warm experience of actually seeing how beautiful and creative those people truly are.

And for the record, I find this discussion interesting and I would be happy to talk about scientific world-views and how they're different from faith-based ones, where they intersect and whether either style of looking at the world provides a complete perspective.

But when you start out on high horses with such disdain, it's just a bummer.

Last edited by viva (10-07-18 18:18:53)

Alatarius · 10-07-18 22:53:36

Why, yes, my question was genuine in so far as I am truly interested in the answer. Since you have so eloquently explained your own viewpoint (thank you!), let me take some time to formulate where I come from. Certainly, life would be so much poorer if we did not have myths, stories, play and imagination, if we spent our days like robots, merely processing and analyzing our surroundings in a hyperlogical manner. Hence, we can, for example, and should rightly, feel joy and awe when watching a beautiful sunset or rainbow, despite the fact that we know that the spectacle is "actually just" refraction of light, explainable by physical theories. In the same vein, if someone finds meaning and purpose in some event which from a purely scientific point of view could only be described as a coincidence, and feels inspired by it and lives a richer life because of that, then I am the first to congratulate -- as long as there is some part of that person which is ready to acknowledge that this experience probably has its roots in a form of make-believe (and I don't mean that term in a disparaging sense). Because, the day your local astrologer tells you that the stars have announced that you better put your money on some herbal remedy instead of the cancer treatment your doctor has prescribed, then is the time to take a step back and consider what the factual basis in reality actually is, and act accordingly. Taken to its extreme, the level of trust and credibility an individual puts in astrology can be literally a matter of life and death. And that is why I ultimately care about people's attitude to horoscopes and the like, not because I smugly enjoy feeling superior to others, but because I think it is for the better for individuals now, and for humanity in the long run, if we foster a general sceptical attitude to claims backed up by no evidence. Because, sometimes, facts matter.

Last edited by Alatarius (11-07-18 04:05:59)

viva · 11-07-18 00:24:56

thank you for your awesome response Alatarius, I truly agree. It's one thing to enjoy oneself poetically with different forms of meaning and story, but you're right, there are times in which facts are really important. For sure there are vulnerable people who are taken advantage of by charlatans all the time, and in fact, we can see how dangerous cults can be for those who desperately want something to believe in.

I don't know if this is the right place to have this conversation, but the question of the line between magic and "reality" is something I do ... not exactly struggle with... but wonder over, as I grow and progress through my life. I definitely don't feel that science and cold hard facts are the only sensible guidelines by which to lead my life. That style of living in the world has not tended to match the fullness of my experience - a huge part of my lived experience is poetic and magical, and often I feel that the more I lean into a storyful life, the more lucky, beautiful, and meaningful my life becomes. I believe there is even a cognitive psychological lens to take which substantiates my choices of belief - we perceive what we are biased towards, and tend to experience what we believe we will experience.

where it gets personal, for me, is when all of the "facts" I can find in media make me feel really sad, and choosing to believe them would make me more miserable and pessimistic.

Like for example, to make it super personal, the many many articles that say that unmarried, childless women over 30 have exponentially decreasing chances of marrying and having a family.

But that's not the only example. For every bright hope I might have which has no actual basis in fact besides my own faith and belief, there's so many negative, social census style articles that give logical-style reasons and quote studies to tell me that, actually, my optimism is wrong and dumb, and they have the numbers to prove it.

However, consistently in life I've experienced that when I'm optimistic and believe that all is unfolding as it should, and there's nothing to be afraid of, I have a happy life and I receive a great deal of good things. I feel like I am growing and finding gratitude and that all is possible.

When I lean into "facts" as they are reported to me by the media and news, I have a much more anxious experience of life. Letting only scientific style rationality define Truth, with no regard for my heart or my intuition, would be like cutting off a limb.

I know there are limits and that scientific facts can be very important, but I would also argue that when we depend entirely upon them and worship them, we miss the part where "facts" can actually be quite creative in and of themselves. They can tell stories in different ways - different sets of data can be used to back up completely contrasting statements of truth. Studies are often found to be flawed, or the very premise of their question to be heavily biased. Truths about historical events are often pulled into question, and the stories told from sets of data are absolutely cultural in nature. Our Western interpretation of certain archaeological discoveries might be completely different from the historical documentation reported by China, for example.

I also have this frustrating experience with men when I was growing up, where I really wanted to talk about or develop an opinion or a thought, but because my mind doesn't work so well to memorise "facts", I often wasn't believed, respected, or listened to by the men I most wanted to approve of my ideas. Under this demand for memorised facts, I would become flustered and anxious, and unable to develop my ideas. This didn't stop happening with men as I grew older - I just learned to hold my own. So I experience this also as a gendered thing.

Now, I am much more confident. I take my time and I don't allow anyone to make me feel flustered. I know that my ideas develop in a less linear fashion than some, and that memorising facts is not my strong point. I don't try to compete in that arena anymore! Now when I talk about my opinions, I'm confident in my right to express myself intellectually in the way that feels good to me - largely theoretical, my metaphors and examples often taken from story, literature, and interpersonal experiences.

So between the actually creative nature of facts, and my knowledge that my natural intellect is indistinguishably intertwined with emotion, aesthetic, feelings and my experience, I'm inclined to question those who separate so easily those "facts" from "beliefs".

I mean, who is defining the "fact"-based "truth"? And are they really always more trustworthy than the astrologers?

Last edited by viva (11-07-18 00:34:31)

_hyperballad_ · 11-07-18 00:40:19

This about sums up my point of view:

https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1152332-webcomics

richard · 11-07-18 01:27:37

viva wrote:

Richard, your enquiry was not sincere. Your 'enquiry' was snide. it implied, heavy-handed, that people who believe in astrology are gullible, unintelligent and do not have rational world-views. Your connection to faith and belief are not the same as mine, but that doesn't mean I'm not intelligent or rational.

It doesn't mean you're not intelligent, but it does mean - in that context - you're not rational. By definition.

viva · 11-07-18 02:25:35

Rational just means "in accordance with reason or logic".

Logic is just a strict system for deduction (reasoning) based on principles of validity. The actual content doesn't matter - all that matters is the structure one uses to create arguments. I am a pretty practical person, and the linguistic practice of logic comes naturally to me.

I consider myself a rational person, which means I have reasons for believing in the things I believe in. I clearly have different postulates than you - a different starting place, different sensory experiences, a different worldview. A body which, unlike yours, is demonstrably affected by heavenly bodies every month. But I am definitely not irrational. Anything that I believe, I have considered in great detail.

richard · 11-07-18 03:22:48

viva wrote:

Rational just means "in accordance with reason or logic".
Logic is just a strict system for deduction (reasoning) based on principles of validity. The actual content doesn't matter - all that matters is the structure one uses to create arguments. I am a pretty practical person, and the linguistic practice of logic comes naturally to me.
I consider myself a rational person, which means I have reasons for believing in the things I believe in. I clearly have different postulates than you - a different starting place, different sensory experiences, a different worldview. A body which, unlike yours, is demonstrably affected by heavenly bodies every month. But I am definitely not irrational. Anything that I believe, I have considered in great detail.

"demonstrably affected"? If you're being rational, you can explain how it is that you know it's the planets that are affecting your body, quoting empirical evidence. Anything at all will do, just one tiny shreck. It has nothing to do with sensory experiences or world views. And by the way, the cycle of the planets is not related to months in any way - they continuously orbit the sun and their interrelationship changes in a smooth and regular fashion. Months are a human invention, they are entirely arbitrary. Nothing in the physical world causes, or is affected by, the time period we call months. That's rational understanding. If you want to hold on to your perception that's up to you, but please don't call it rational.

_hyperballad_ · 11-07-18 03:58:25

The moon is a planet & it affects a lot of things to do with the human body.

http://science.time.com/2013/07/25/how- … our-sleep/

https://www.myhormonology.com/hormone-h … ual-cycle/

^I can quote many more articles if you would like more evidence, but these 2 are quite good & have the studies hyperlinked.

Sometimes supposedly esoteric notions are rooted in reality.

richard · 11-07-18 04:14:45

That IS interesting, but it's not related to astrology. It says nothing about personality or destiny, and isn't related to the planets. Also the lunar cycle isn't monthly.

_hyperballad_ · 11-07-18 04:27:34

Errr. The moon is a planet & it definitely relates to other planets. This specific planet has (so far) been proven scientifically to affect mood, sleep, digestion, menstruation, ovulation, even in-vitro gender assignment. The moon also absolutely relates to astrology. For example we're in a Cancer moon at the moment which I could post a link about but you would totally scoff at.

Rigid faith in science can be just as problematic as rigid faith in spirituality.

viva · 11-07-18 05:16:52

Richard, Im not talking about human calendars, I’m talking about the moon - 28-day cycles. I know the moons cycle effects my physical hormonal cycle as surely as it effects the tides. If i live in places with less light pollution and spend time outside, invariably my cycle syncs to the moon - i will ovulate with the full moon and menstruate on the new. The full moon is so associated with changing behaviours in human beings that the word “lunacy” is derived from its Latin name. There’s easy proof that human emotions and behaviours can be effected by heavenly bodies. The sun of course also effects us emotionally and hormonally - ever heard of seasonal effective disorder?

I’m not trying to discuss destiny or personality types with you. I’m just saying that the stars - our star, at least - and the moon have tangible hormonaland therefore behavorial effects on human beings. I’m also saying that my experiences are different from yours, and so my perspective is too. I find rich academic and rational meaning in the human need for and attraction to myth and story. I see the scientific method as only one way to arrive at explanations for natural phenomena. It’s a good way, but a scientific perspective is not appropriate for everything.

#1 11-05-18 02:45:44

How many people are into feet?

#2 11-05-18 05:55:19

Re: How many people are into feet?

#3 11-05-18 09:08:52

Re: How many people are into feet?

#4 03-07-18 14:55:17

Re: How many people are into feet?

#5 04-07-18 03:46:24

Re: How many people are into feet?

#6 04-07-18 22:20:54

Re: How many people are into feet?

#7 04-07-18 22:21:59

Re: How many people are into feet?

#8 05-07-18 21:40:16

Re: How many people are into feet?

#9 06-07-18 06:45:25

Re: How many people are into feet?

#10 08-07-18 15:38:03

Re: How many people are into feet?

#11 10-07-18 07:16:40

Re: How many people are into feet?

#12 10-07-18 07:51:59

Re: How many people are into feet?

#13 10-07-18 09:00:48

Re: How many people are into feet?

#14 10-07-18 11:42:00

Re: How many people are into feet?

#15 10-07-18 17:37:01

Re: How many people are into feet?

#16 10-07-18 22:53:36

Re: How many people are into feet?

#17 11-07-18 00:24:56

Re: How many people are into feet?

#18 11-07-18 00:40:19

Re: How many people are into feet?

#19 11-07-18 01:27:37

Re: How many people are into feet?

#20 11-07-18 02:25:35

Re: How many people are into feet?

#21 11-07-18 03:22:48

Re: How many people are into feet?

#22 11-07-18 03:58:25

Re: How many people are into feet?

#23 11-07-18 04:14:45

Re: How many people are into feet?

#24 11-07-18 04:27:34

Re: How many people are into feet?

#25 11-07-18 05:16:52

Re: How many people are into feet?

Board footer