You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Sorry, a little bit of criticism:
So far, all IFM videos have been filmed and edited very carefully and quietly. No enervating pans, precise cuts and above all, no stupid zooms (I hate zoom except for a few drone shots). This quality is one of the reasons why I like IFM.
But today at Lilly_P’s, Up Close1 from 04:54 to 05:06 I see the good concept corrupted and it slips off in the direction of dilettantish, ordinary porn.
What happened? New cameraman? Bad editor?
Offline
I have to disagree with Kypris about Lilly P's latest video. I think it's wonderful. I love the little smile on her face, and the recent changes in her body. If Lilly reads this - you did your usual wonderful job. And I think the editor - Mew? - did a great job too.
Offline
Sorry, I have to support Kypris on this. The lights and the setting were fine as always, and Lilly herself ... well, she is beyond criticism. But I was wondering why the camera remained focused exclusively on that one body part, before zooming out like a tourist camera on a holiday trip. Too late, that is – the pleasure of seeing her face and body when she orgasmed was refrained from us. is this a new approach?
Offline
I have to disagree with Kypris about Lilly P's latest video. I think it's wonderful. I love the little smile on her face, and the recent changes in her body
Sure, Lilly_P is beautiful and super sexy as always but I'm not talking about her, I'm criticizing the camera work from 04:54 to 05:06. Clear?
Offline
That's an editing mistake that has now been fixed.
Offline
Thanks Richard, now it's perfect as usual by IFM.
Offline
Not my edit this time, Frances and I split the IFM shoots pretty equally.
IFM video editor / contributor
Offline
i actually kinda dug the zooms, for me it didn't quite lapse into the lack of care and respect that kypris alludes to, but rather reinforced the vicarious function of the camera, that it sees for us, and heightened the performative nature of Lilly's contribution. It was perhaps a bit unquestioningly and problematically voyeuristic, but it's a testament to the craft of IFM that even when it lurches there there's still class and polish.
thanks for the quick fix tho! wish I kept the older one as an interesting compare and contrast of a work in progress
Offline
That was my fault- not Mew's. My sincere apologies to anyone affected by the editing mistake (especially Lilly_P) and a huge thank you to Kypris for bringing it to our attention quickly so it could be rectified.
xx
Last edited by Frances (28-08-18 05:22:42)
-IFM editor
Offline
Pages: 1